During a parliamentary debate on political salaries, Singapore’s Minister for Trade and Industry, Tan See Leng, highlighted the potential narrowing of the nation’s pool of political leaders if the personal costs associated with public service continue to rise. Tan emphasized that public service demands significant personal sacrifices, such as longer working hours, greater responsibilities, increased scrutiny, and diminished privacy. For professionals contemplating a transition into politics, it often involves leaving behind flourishing private-sector careers, typically at the height of their success.
Tan cited examples of prominent figures like Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan and former Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen, who both relinquished thriving medical careers to pursue political roles. He noted that their ministerial salaries likely could not compete with the lucrative financial prospects they abandoned. Tan argued that Singapore stands to gain from the involvement of seasoned professionals in politics, especially those in their prime, such as entrepreneurs, finance experts, and mid-career executives juggling family duties. Nonetheless, these individuals must consider the potential loss of time, future career paths, personal aspirations, privacy, and income.
The minister cautioned that if the personal costs become prohibitive, Singapore might lose capable potential leaders, not due to a lack of willingness to serve, but because the overall demands of public service outweigh the benefits. Tan himself joined politics at the age of 55 after a successful three-decade-long career in the private sector. Prior to his government role, which began in 2020, he held influential positions within the healthcare industry, including serving as group CEO and managing director of Parkway Pantai.
Reflecting on his own journey, Tan acknowledged how his extensive private-sector experience afforded him financial stability and more freedom when deciding to enter politics. He stated that no feasible ministerial salary could have equaled the earnings he achieved in his previous roles. His insights underscore the challenges faced by professionals considering a shift to public service, where the opportunity cost can be substantial.